4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Energy dissipation in depth-sensing indentation as a characteristic of the nanoscratch behavior of coatings

Journal

WEAR
Volume 267, Issue 5-8, Pages 1146-1152

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2009.01.043

Keywords

Energy dissipation; Depth-sensing indentation technique; Nanoscratch test; Ti-N coatings; Ti-C coatings

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wear behavior of coatings has usually been described in terms of mechanical properties such as hardness (H) and effective elastic modulus (E*). Alternatively, an energy approach appears as a promising analysis taking into account the influence of those properties. In a nanoindentation test, the dissipated energy depends not only on the hardness and elastic modulus, but also on the elastic recovery (W-e). This work aims to establish a relation between plastic deformation energy (E-p) during depth-sensing indentation method and the grooving resistance of coatings in nanoscratch tests. An energy dissipation coefficient (K-d) was defined, calculated as the ratio of the plastic to the total deformation energy (E-p/E-t), which represents the energy dissipation of materials. Reactive depositions using titanium as the target and nitrogen and methane as reactive gases were obtained by triode magnetron sputtering, in order to assess wear and nanoindentation data. A topographical, chemical and microstructural characterization has been conducted using X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), wave dispersion spectroscopy (WDS), scanning electron (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) techniques. Nanoscratch results showed that the groove depth was well correlated to the energy dissipation coefficient of the coatings. On the other hand, a reduction in the coefficient was found when the elastic recovery was increased. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available