4.6 Article

Biosorption of Mercury by Reed (Phragmites australis) as a Potential Clean Water Technology

Journal

WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION
Volume 229, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-018-3978-8

Keywords

Biosorption; Mercury; Reed

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heavy metals are causing serious environmental and health problems worldwide, especially in places where mining is one of the major drivers of the country's economy. Conventional technologies are considered expensive when providing the safe water; for this reason, new clean water technologies are needed. Biosorption has gained attention as a cost-effective system that uses biological materials to remove heavy metals from water; however, it can be noted that an efficient and proven biosorbent for several heavy metal has not been found. Reed (Phragmites australis) has demonstrated to be a potential biosorbent to remove several heavy metals because it is commonly found as heavy metal accumulator in wetlands. This study is focused on mercury (Hg) removal by using reed as biosorbent. Batch experiments were conducted and the microstructure of the biosorbent was analyzed by scanning electron microscope. The Langmuir isotherm and Freundlich isotherm model was applied for the data obtained. The pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order models were used to test adsorption kinetics data to investigate the mechanism of biosorption. A comparison with the performance of various adsorbents reported in literature was made. The results contribute to understand the use of Phragmites australis as potential biomass for biosorbent technology since it removed mercury (Hg) effectively in high concentrations. This study supports a variety of researches to achieve clean water technologies, and biosorption has proved to be a useful alternative to the conventional systems for the removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available