4.2 Article

Erythrocyte storage in hypertonic (SAGM) or isotonic (PAGGSM) conservation medium: influence on cell properties

Journal

VOX SANGUINIS
Volume 95, Issue 4, Pages 280-287

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2008.01097.x

Keywords

aggregation; cell volume; ektacytometry; erythrocyte; osmolality; viscosity

Categories

Funding

  1. Bonizzi-Theler Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Objectives Prolonged red blood cell (RBC) storage may be associated with increased post-transfusion morbidity and mortality. A contributing factor is RBC storage lesions. We analysed the role of additive conservation solutions, either hypertonic or isotonic, on such cell properties. Materials and Methods After blood donation in citrate-phosphate-dextrose as an anticoagulant, 10 RBC units were stored with saline-adenine-glucose-mannitol (SAGM; 376 mOsm/l) and 10 units with phosphate-adenine-glucose-guanosin-saline-mannitol (PAGGSM; 285 mOsm/l). Measurements were made on days 1 and 42 of storage. Results The mean cellular volume measured by centrifuged microhaematocrit increased from 87.6 +/- 3.1 fl to 100.7 +/- 4.3 fl in PAGGSM and to 92.2 +/- 2.5 fl in SAGM (P < 0.001) on day 1, after 42 days it was 95.8 +/- 4.0 fl and 93.8 +/- 3.9 fl, respectively. Spontaneous haemolysis and osmotic fragility were lower after storage in PAGGSM. Both additives showed a similar degree of echinocytosis, decreased RBC aggregability and deformability, and increased RBC suspension viscosity after storage. Conclusions The isotonic PAGGSM prevented the initial RBC swelling caused by citrate-phosphate-dextrose less than hypertonic SAGM, but reduced the spontaneous haemolysis rate and osmotic fragility after 42 days of storage. All other parameters, such as echinocytosis, decreased RBC deformability and aggregability, and increased blood viscosity was similar for both additive solutions and remained a major problem of blood banking.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available