4.6 Review

Low-resolution face recognition: a review

Journal

VISUAL COMPUTER
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 359-386

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00371-013-0861-x

Keywords

Review; Face recognition; Low-resolution; Super-resolution; Feature extraction; Feature classification

Funding

  1. National Key Technology R&D Program of China [2012BAH01F03]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [60973061]
  3. National Basic Research (973) Program of China [2011CB302203]
  4. Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [20100009110004]
  5. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [4123104]
  6. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2013M530020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low-resolution face recognition (LR FR) aims to recognize faces from small size or poor quality images with varying pose, illumination, expression, etc. It has received much attention with increasing demands for long distance surveillance applications, and extensive efforts have been made on LR FR research in recent years. However, many issues in LR FR are still unsolved, such as super-resolution (SR) for face recognition, resolution-robust features, unified feature spaces, and face detection at a distance, although many methods have been developed for that. This paper provides a comprehensive survey on these methods and discusses many related issues. First, it gives an overview on LR FR, including concept description, system architecture, and method categorization. Second, many representative methods are broadly reviewed and discussed. They are classified into two different categories, super-resolution for LR FR and resolution-robust feature representation for LR FR. Their strategies and advantages/disadvantages are elaborated. Some relevant issues such as databases and evaluations for LR FR are also presented. By generalizing their performances and limitations, promising trends and crucial issues for future research are finally discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available