4.5 Article

Characterization of the Chaetoceros salsugineum nuclear inclusion virus coat protein gene

Journal

VIRUS RESEARCH
Volume 142, Issue 1-2, Pages 127-133

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2009.01.021

Keywords

CsNIV; Diatom virus; Circovirus; Chaetoceros; Nanovirus

Categories

Funding

  1. Korean Government (MOEHRD) [KRF-2006-351-F00002]
  2. New University for Regional Innovation (NURI) program at Pukyong National University
  3. Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Analysis of the genome of Chaetoceros salsugineum nuclear inclusion virus (CsNIV) revealed the presence of six putative open reading frames (ORFs) in the genome. We further characterized ORF3, which encodes a putative coat protein. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using ORF3 gene-specific primers amplified a single DNA band nearly 1.2 kb. This amplified product was gel-purified, cloned, sequenced, and expressed in Escherichia coli. Specific antiserum was raised against the recombinant protein and used for Western blotting to test whether the ORF3 protein is the CsNIV coat protein. One major CsNIV protein of approximately 46 kDa reacted positively with the antiserum, suggesting that this antiserum is specific for the CsNIV coat protein. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) analysis of the 46 kDa structural band revealed 14 peptide sequences that matched the ORF3 regions of CsNIV. The expression of ORF3 in host cells was examined by constructing a cDNA library of CsNIV-infected cells. Nucleotide sequences of the cDNA clones were complementary to various regions of both CsNIV ORF3 and ORF4; however, no clones containing only the ORF3 region were identified. Also, Northern blotting revealed a single 2.5-kb transcript, indicating that ORF3 could be transcribed together with ORF4. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available