4.4 Article

A fusion protein of HCMV IE1 exon4 and IE2 exon5 stimulates potent cellular immunity in an MVA vaccine vector

Journal

VIROLOGY
Volume 377, Issue 2, Pages 379-390

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.04.034

Keywords

human cytomegalovirus; viral vaccine; attenuated poxvirus; cellular immunity; transgenic mouse model; memory T cells; regulatory proteins; tegument protein

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P01 CA030206-260013, CA030206, P30 CA033572, R01 CA077544-10S1, P01 CA030206, R21 CA114889, CA077544, R01 CA077544, R01 CA077544-10, CA114889, CA033572] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [M01-RR00043-39, M01 RR000043, M01 RR000043-475768] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIAID NIH HHS [R21 AI062496-02, AI062496, R21 AI062496, U01 AI163090, AI049357, R01 AI058148, AI058148] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A therapeutic CMV vaccine incorporating an antigenic repertoire capable of eliciting a cellular immune response has yet to be successfully implemented for patients who already have acquired an infection. To address this problem, we have developed a vaccine candidate derived from modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) that expresses three immunodominant antigens (pp65, IE1, IE2) from CMV. The novelty of this vaccine is the fusion of two adjacent exons from the immediate-early region of CMV, their successful expression in MVA, and robust immunogenicity in both primary and memory response models. Evaluation of the immunogenicity of the viral vaccine in mouse models shows that it can stimulate primary immunity against all three antigens in both the CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell subsets. Evaluation of human PBMC from healthy CMV-positive donors or patients within 6 months of receiving hematopoietic cell transplant shows robust stimulation of existing CMV-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell subsets. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available