4.3 Article

p63 short isoforms are found in invasive carcinomas only and not in benign breast conditions

Journal

VIRCHOWS ARCHIV
Volume 456, Issue 4, Pages 395-401

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00428-010-0900-1

Keywords

Breast carcinoma; p63; Molecular characterization; Alternative isoforms

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of University and Research (MIUR) of Italy
  2. University of Bologna

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two N-terminal isoforms characterize the p63 protein: the transactivating isoform TAp63 and the amino-terminal truncated isoform Delta Np63. Two further N-terminal isoforms lacking exon 4 (d4TAp63 and Delta Np73L) have been reported. Purpose of the study was to investigate the molecular expression of N-terminal p63 isoforms in benign and malignant breast tissues. Eighteen randomly selected cases of invasive breast carcinoma (IBC) of luminal type, two cases of in situ duct carcinoma (DCIS/DIN), and 20 specimens of normal and benign breast tissues were studied. All cases were immunostained for p63. Reverse polymerase chain reaction and nested PCR were performed to evaluate p63 N-terminal expression patterns. These isoforms whenever present were validated by sequencing. All cases of normal breast, benign lesions, and the two cases of DCIS/DIN expressed Delta Np63 and TAp63 isoforms only. The two variants lacking exon 4 (Delta Np73L and d4TAp63) were not found. All invasive carcinomas expressed the Delta Np63 and TAp63 isoforms as well as the two short isoforms lacking exon 4 which were found in 11 (d4TAp63) and four (Delta Np73L) cases. The present cases of luminal-type IBC showed p63 isoforms together with short variants lacking exon 4. These isoforms were not observed in non-neoplastic breast tissue. Presence of p63 in invasive breast carcinomas of luminal type, as seen at molecular level, suggests caution to include p63 as a marker of basal-like carcinomas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available