4.1 Article

Phylogenomics of the green ash eucalypts (Myrtaceae): a tale of reticulate evolution and misidentification

Journal

AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY
Volume 28, Issue 5-6, Pages 326-354

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/SB15038

Keywords

Australia; DArT; Diversity Arrays Technology; Eucalyptus; hybridisation; phylogenetics; recombination

Funding

  1. ARC Linkage Grant [LP110100721]
  2. Australian Postgraduate Award
  3. Australian Research Council [LP110100721] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Eucalyptus is a genus that occurs in a range of habitats in Australia, Papua New Guinea, Timor, Sulawesi and the Philippines, with several species being used as sources of timber and fibre. However, despite its ecological and commercial significance, understanding its evolutionary history remains a challenge. The focus of the present study is the green ashes (subgenus Eucalyptus section Eucalyptus). Although previous studies, based primarily on morphology, suggest that the green ashes form a monophyletic group, there has been disagreement concerning the divergence of taxa. The present study aims to estimate the phylogeny of the green ashes and closely related eucalypts (37 taxa from over 50 locations in south-eastern Australia), using genome-wide analyses based on Diversity Arrays Technology (DArT). Results of analyses were similar in topology and consistent with previous phylogenies based on sequence data. Many of the relationships supported those proposed by earlier workers. However, other relationships, particularly of taxa within the Sydney region and Blue Mountains, were not consistent with previous classifications. These findings raise important questions concerning how we define species and discern relationships in Eucalyptus and may have implications for other plant species, particularly those with a complex evolutionary history where hybridisation and recombination have occurred.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available