4.5 Review

Molecular genetic approaches for identifying the basis of variation in resistance to tick infestation in cattle

Journal

VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY
Volume 180, Issue 3-4, Pages 165-172

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.05.048

Keywords

Tick; Cattle; SNP; Microsatellite; Gene mapping; Gene expression; GWAS

Funding

  1. Endeavour International Postgraduate Research Scholarship
  2. University of Queensland International Student Living Allowance
  3. University of Queensland Graduate School
  4. Cooperative Research Centre for Beef Genetic Technologies (Beef CRC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years there has been renewed interest in the adaptation of cattle to challenging environments, largely driven by advances in genomic methods. The current interest in tick resistance is understandable given the major production and welfare implications of tick infestation in tropical and subtropical zones where around 70% of beef cattle are located. Heritability for tick burden in cattle has been shown to range about 0.30, which is sufficient to result in the success of some programs of selection for tick resistance in cattle. Gene-expression studies strongly indicate that both immune and non-immune mechanisms are associated with tick resistance in cattle. Recent quantitative-trait mapping studies have identified chromosome segments and single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with tick burden, but no causal variant has been identified so far. Most of the genetic markers identified for tick burden explain a relatively small proportion of the variance, which is typical of markers for quantitative traits. This leads to the conclusion that panels of multiple markers for tick resistance rather than a single marker will most likely be developed, possibly involving specific panels for zebu or taurine breeds, which could be used for future selection and breeding programs in cattle. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available