4.5 Article

Echinococcosis in pigs and intestinal infection with Echinococcus spp. in dogs in southwestern Lithuania

Journal

VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY
Volume 160, Issue 3-4, Pages 237-241

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.11.011

Keywords

Echinococcus granulosus; 'pig strain'; Echinococcus multilocularis; Lithuania

Funding

  1. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO) [TCP/LIT/3001]
  2. SwissBalticNet (Gebert Ruf Stiftung)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cystic echinococcosis is a major emerging zoonosis in many Eastern European and Asian countries. Post slaughter examinations of 684 pig livers in Lithuania revealed significantly higher numbers of Echinococcus granulosus infections in animals from family farms (13.2%; 95% CI 10.7-16.2) as compared with those from industrial farms (4.1%; 95% CI 0.8-11.5). The prevalence was also significantly higher in pigs older than I year than in younger ones. In addition, in 0.5% of the pigs from the family farms, infertile and calcified E. multilocularis lesions were identified by PCR. Faecal samples from rural dogs (n = 240) originating from 177 family farms in 12 villages were investigated for taeniid eggs with two methods. Significantly more dogs excreting taeniid eggs were diagnosed with the flotation/sieving method (n = 34) as compared to the modified McMaster method (n = 12). Multiplex PCR performed with DNA from taeniid eggs isolated from faeces of 34 dogs revealed 26 infections with Taenia spp., 9 with E. granulosus and 2 with E multilocularis (4 cases with concurrent Taenia spp. and E. granulosus or E multilocularis infections). Genotyping of E. granulosus cyst tissues from 7 pigs, I head of cattle and from E. granulosus eggs from 8 dog faeces revealed the genotype G6/7 ('pig/camel strain') in all cases. The high infection pressure with Echinococcus spp. in family farms necessitates initiating control programs. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available