4.7 Article

Molecular characterization of Aeromonas species isolated from farmed eels (Anguilla japonica)

Journal

VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 164, Issue 1-2, Pages 195-200

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.02.006

Keywords

Aeromonas spp.; Phylogenetic identification; gyrB; rpoD; Enterotoxin gene; Eel

Funding

  1. Chonbuk National University
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  3. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [1101002330]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Seventy Aeromonas strains were identified by phylogenetic analysis using housekeeping genes (gyrB and rpoD) in order to investigate etiological agents for aeromoniasis in farmed eels (Anguilla japonica). The phylogenetic analysis showed that Aeromonas aquariorum (n = 22, 31.4%) was the predominant species among the investigated eel strains, followed by Aeromonas caviae (n = 16, 22.9%), A. veronii (n = 13, 18.6%), A. hydrophila (n = 12, 17.1%), A. jandaei (n = 4, 5.7%), A. media (n = 2, 2.9%), and A. trota (n = 1, 1.4%). The potential virulence of the present strains was estimated by performing PCR assays using the following seven virulence genes: cytotoxic enterotoxin (act), two cytotonic enterotoxins (aft and ast), glycerophospholipid:cholesterol acyltransferase (gcaT), DNase (exu), lipase (lip), and flagellin (fla). The detection rates of act, alt, ast, gcaT, exu, lip, and fla among all 70 strains were 91.4%, 55.7%, 27.1%, 97.1%, 95.7%, 100%, and 98.6%, respectively. In genotyping of enterotoxin genes, act(+)/alt(+)/ast(+), act(+)/alt(+)/ast(-), and act(+)/alt(-)/ast(-) genotypes were prevalent in A. hydrophila (8/12 strains), A. aquariorum (13/22 strains), and A. caviae (14/16 strains), respectively, suggesting a high heterogeneity among Aeromonas species. In this study, A. aquariorum, which has been an unrecorded species in Korea, can be an etiological agent for aeromoniasis of eel. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available