4.7 Article

The role of toll-like receptors in the pathogenesis of Streptococcus suis

Journal

VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 156, Issue 1-2, Pages 147-156

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.10.014

Keywords

Streptococcus suis sequence type 7; Streptococcal toxic shock-like syndrome; Toll-like receptors; Cytokines

Funding

  1. State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control [50153-3]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology, PR China [2009ZX10004-108]
  3. MDEIE
  4. China-Quebec Collaboration Grant [2008FA31830, 2008DFA31830]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Streptococcus suis is an important agent of swine and human meningitis. Sequence type (ST) 7 emerged in China and was responsible for the human epidemic caused by S. suis in 2005. The virulence of S. suis ST7 is greater than the wild type pathogenic S. suis, 511; however, the mechanisms for this increased pathogenicity are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the role of different toll-like receptors (TLRs) involved in regulating the host response to the S. suis infection and to speculate on differing mechanisms used by ST7 strains to induce disease. Here we compared two ST7 strains isolated in the 2005 Sichuan outbreak to two 511 strains. Our data show TLR2, 6 and 9 are involved in the recognition of heat-killed S. suis independent of the ST type. We found the TLR-dependent cytokine production differed between the two types of strains using whole cell lysate proteins. TLR6 played a greater role in cytokine production induced by the whole cell lysate proteins from the ST7 strain than in that induced by the ST1 strain lysates. The data suggest that mechanisms of inflammation induced by S. suis strains differ where this will be useful in designing efficient strategies in combating streptococcal toxic shock-like syndrome caused by the S. suis ST7 strains. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available