4.4 Article

Association of growth, feeding practices and exercise conditions with the severity of the osteoarticular status of limbs in French foals

Journal

VETERINARY JOURNAL
Volume 197, Issue 1, Pages 65-71

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.03.043

Keywords

Horse; Developmental orthopaedic disease; Risk factor; Radiographic findings; Severity

Funding

  1. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique
  2. French Ministere de l'Agriculture
  3. Haras Nationaux
  4. Conseil Regional de Basse Normandie

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for the severity of Juvenile OsteoChondral Conditions (JOCC) in limbs of French foals. Twenty-one farms in Normandy, France, were sampled and enrolled in a cohort study including 378 foals from three breeds, followed from the 8th month of pregnancy of the mares until the foals were approximately 6 months old. Data on growth, feeding practices and exercise conditions were regularly collected. The carpus, the front and hind digits, the hock and the stifle of the foals were radiographed at the end of follow-up. JOCC severity in each foal was described using a global appraisal of its osteoarticular status (OAS) depending on the number and the severity of radiographic findings. Of the 378 foals, 53% had a good OAS, 34% had an intermediate OAS and 13% had a poor OAS. The breed (Selle Francais and French Trotter Standardbred vs. Thoroughbred), a high girth perimeter at early age and an irregular exercise were significantly associated with a poor OAS. This study contributes to the understanding of the development of JOCC. An increased growth and reduced or irregular physical activity during the first weeks of life would be responsible for more severe lesions. Growth and exercise conditions should be carefully monitored to reduce the prevalence of severe JOCC in foals. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available