4.2 Article

Response rate to a single dose of vinblastine administered to dogs with treatment-naive multicentric lymphoma

Journal

VETERINARY AND COMPARATIVE ONCOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages 636-641

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/vco.12433

Keywords

chemotherapy; large cell; lymphosarcoma

Funding

  1. Resident Research Grant Competition [28300000-186-3100-CRRNT, UFID39699201]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vincristine is included in vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy protocols, which are the gold-standard treatment for high-grade canine lymphoma. Vincristine can result in relatively high rates of gastrointestinal toxicity, whereas vinblastine is generally well tolerated and thus may represent an under-utilized and minimally toxic alternative to vincristine. Our objective was to determine the response rate and toxicity associated with a single dose of vinblastine administered to dogs with treatment-naive, intermediate to large-cell, multicentric lymphoma. Twenty client-owned dogs were enrolled with signed owner consent. A Simon's minimax, phase II, two-stage trial was performed to test the efficacy of vinblastine administered at 2 mg/m(2) IV followed by a pilot trial of vinblastine at 2.5 mg/m(2). No dogs were administered concurrent steroids or other chemotherapy. One out of 14 dogs receiving vinblastine at 2 mg/m(2) demonstrated a partial response. Three out of five dogs demonstrated a partial response to vinblastine at 2.5 mg/m(2). Gastrointestinal toxicity was infrequent and low grade for both groups. The majority of dogs (80%) in the 2.5 mg/m(2) dosing group developed neutropenia 1-week post administration. Vinblastine was well tolerated but minimally efficacious at a dose of 2 mg/m(2) IV in dogs with treatment-naive, multicentric lymphoma. Because of poor response rates, treatment at this dose is not recommended. A small subset of dogs administered 2.5 mg/m(2) had significantly improved response rates (P = 0.04), suggesting that higher doses may have improved efficacy, although further research is indicated to confirm these preliminary findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available