4.5 Article

Comparison of the immune responses induced by soluble and particulate Plasmodium vivax circumsporozoite vaccine candidates formulated in AS01 in rhesus macaques

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 31, Issue 52, Pages 6216-6224

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.10.041

Keywords

Malaria; Plasmodium vivax; Immune response; VMP001; CSV-S,S; AS01

Funding

  1. GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA
  2. Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR)
  3. PATH-Malaria Vaccine Initiative (MVI)
  4. MVI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have designed a pre-erythrocytic vaccine candidate based on the Plasmodium vivax circumsporozoite (CSV) protein, which includes its N- and C-terminal parts and a truncated region containing repeat sequences from both the VK210 and the VK247 P. vivax subtypes. Two versions of this vaccine candidate were made: a soluble recombinant protein expressed in Escherichia coli, designated VMP001 and a particulate antigen expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, designated CSV-S,S. The latter is composed of CSV-S, a fusion protein between VMP001 and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and free HBsAg co-expressed in yeast and self-assembling into mixed particles. Both antigen versions, adjuvanted with AS01, were shown to be immunogenic in rhesus monkeys. CSV-S,S/AS01 induced higher levels of VMP001-specific antibodies than did VMP001/AS01. Antibody responses against the N- and C-terminal regions of CSV and the VI(210 repeat motif were of a similar magnitude following immunization with either the soluble or the particulate antigen. However, antibodies against the AGDR region, a potentially protective B cell epitope, were only detected after immunization with CSV-S,S. Analysis of the induced CD4(+) T cells highlighted different cytokine profiles depending on the antigen form. These results warrant further clinical evaluation of these two vaccine candidates to assess the added value of a particulate versus soluble form of CSV, in terms of both immunogenicity and protective efficacy. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available