4.5 Article

Characterization of rationally attenuated Francisella tularensis vaccine strains that harbor deletions in the guaA and guaB genes

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 27, Issue 18, Pages 2426-2436

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.02.073

Keywords

Francisella tularensis; Tularemia vaccine; LVS

Funding

  1. NIH Cooperative Agreement [U54 AI57168]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Francisella tularensis, the etiologic agent of tularemia, can cause severe and fatal infection after inhalation of as few as10-100 CFU. F.tularensis is a potential bioterrorism agent and, therefore, a priority for countermeasure development. Vaccination with the live vaccine strain (LVS), developed from a Type B strain, confers partial protection against aerosal exposure to the more virulent Type A strains and provides proof of principle that a live attenuated vaccine strain may be efficacious. However LVS suffers from several notable drawbacks that have prevented its licensure and widespread use. To address the specific deficiencies that render LVS a sub-optimal tularemia vaccine, we engineered F tularensis LVS strains with targeted deletions in the guaA or guaB genes that encode critical enzymes in the guanine nucleotide biosynthetic pathway. F.tularensis LVS Delta guaA and LVS Delta guaB Mutants were guanine auxotrophs and were highly attenuated in a mouse model of infection. While the mutants failed to replicate in macrophages, a robust proinflammatory cytokine response, equivalent to that of the parental LVS, was elicited. Mice vaccinated with a single dose of the F tularensis LVS Delta guaA or LVS Delta guaB mutant were fully protected against Subsequent lethal challenge with the LVS parental strain. These findings suggest the specific deletion of these target genes could generate a safe and efficacious live attenuated vaccine. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available