4.4 Article

Safety of Everolimus by Treatment Duration in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Cancer in an Expanded Access Program

Journal

UROLOGY
Volume 81, Issue 1, Pages 143-149

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.09.019

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Novartis
  2. Pfizer
  3. GlaxoSmithKline
  4. Sanofi-Aventis
  5. Bayer
  6. Jannsen
  7. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  8. Sanofi
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE To retrospectively analyze the effects of treatment duration on outcomes of everolimus treatment of patients in the RAD001 Expanded-Access Clinical Trial in RCC (REACT) program. METHODS Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma refractory to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor received everolimus (10 mg once daily), with dosing interruption or modifications allowed for toxicity. All serious and grade 3/4 adverse events and grade 1/2 adverse events leading to a change in drug administration were reported. Tumor response was evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors. RESULTS The study stratified 1367 evaluable patients into treatment duration groups of <3 months, >= 3 and <6 months, >= 6 months and <1 year, and >= 1 year. Pneumonia, noninfectious pneumonitis, and hyperglycemia occurred more frequently in patients receiving everolimus for >= 1 year but did not result in treatment discontinuations. First occurrence of adverse events presented early in the treatment course for most patients. Treatment duration of >= 6 months was associated with improved disease control rates. CONCLUSION Everolimus is well tolerated in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma for treatment durations >= 1 year and not associated with cumulative toxicity. UROLOGY 81: 143-149, 2013. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available