4.4 Article

Racial Differences in the Prevalence of Overactive Bladder in the United States From the Epidemiology of LUTS (EpiLUTS) Study

Journal

UROLOGY
Volume 79, Issue 1, Pages 95-101

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.09.010

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Pfizer, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES To estimate the prevalence of overactive bladder (OAB) in men and women in the United States (US) to determine whether there were racial differences. METHODS This was a secondary analysis of data from the EpiLUTS (Epidemiology of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms) survey, an Internet-based cross-sectional, population-representative epidemiologic survey conducted in the US, UK, and Sweden. These analyses were limited to the data of men and women aged 40 and older from the US. The presence of OAB was defined as experiencing urinary urgency or urinary urgency incontinence. Case definitions of OAB symptoms were categorized as occurring at least sometimes. Prevalence rates of OAB were estimated by race. Logistic regression analyses were conducted for each gender to examine the role of race on OAB status, controlling for risk factors and comorbid conditions. RESULTS The response rate in the US was 59.6%. A total of 9237 men and 10,407 women self-identified their race and were included in the analytic sample. The prevalence of OAB at least sometimes ranged from 26% in Asian men to 33% in African American men. Similarly, the prevalence of OAB at least sometimes was lowest in Asian women (27%) and highest in African American women (46%). Race was predictive of OAB in men but not for women. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of OAB ranged from 26-33% across races for men and from 27-46% across races for women. African American and Hispanic race is predictive of OAB for men but not for women. UROLOGY 79: 95-101, 2012. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available