4.4 Article

Analysis of energy utilization and body composition in kidney, bladder, and adrenal cancer patients

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.07.017

Keywords

Resting energy expenditure; Body composition; Substrate utilization; Kidney cancer; Adrenal cancer; Metabolism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate resting energy expenditure (REE) and body composition and the relationship between substrate utilization and energy expenditure in urologic cancer patients. Patients and methods: Measured resting energy expenditure (mREE) was detected by indirect calorimetry in 122 urologic cancer patients and 131 control subjects. Extracellular fluid (ECF), intracellular fluid (ICF), and total water (TW) were measured by bioelectrical impedance appliance. Fat oxidation rate (F-O), carbohydrate oxidation rate, fat mass (FM), and fat free mass (FFM) were further determined. Results: Compared with the controls, cancer patients showed significantly elevated mREE and mREE/FFM (P = 0.049; P < 0.001). Of all the cancer patients, 50% (n = 61) were hypermetabolic, 43.4% (n = 53) normometabolic, and 6.6% (n = 8) hypometabolic, whereas 35.1% (n = 46) of the controls were hypermetabolic, 56.5% (n = 74) normometabolic, and 8.4% (n = 11) hypometabolic. REE was correlated to substrate oxidation rate (R-2 = 0.710). Cancer patients exhibited no significant difference in FM, FM/body weight (BW) and FFM, compared with controls. Cancer patients presented no significant difference in TW compared with controls (P = 0.791), but they had increased ECF (P < 0.001) and decreased ICF (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Aberrations in substrate utilization may contribute to the elevated energy expenditure in urologic cancer patients. Cancer type and pathologic stage are influential factors of REE. (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available