4.1 Article

Acute Kidney Injury Induced by Various Pneumoperitoneum Pressures in a Rabbit Model of Mild and Severe Hydronephrosis

Journal

UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS
Volume 94, Issue 2, Pages 225-233

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000362845

Keywords

Acute injury; Pneumoperitoneum pressures; Hydronephrosis; Endoscopy; Endourology; Kidney; Laparoscopy

Funding

  1. National Science Fund Project of China [81400698]
  2. Dr research fund project of Wuhan University of China [2012302020203]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Increased pneunnoperitoneum pressure during laparoscopic surgery can result in acute kidney injury. We aimed to clarify whether intraabdonninal pressure tolerance is modified in various degrees of unilateral kidney hydronephrosis in rabbits. Methods: A total 90 rabbits were randomly allocated to three groups (group PN, PM and PS, i.e. rabbits with no, mild and severe hydronephrosis, respectively, subjected to intraabdonninal pressures). Rabbits in group PM (n = 30) and group PS (n = 30) underwent a surgical procedure inducing a mild or severe left hydronephrosis. Rabbits in all groups were then allocated to 5 subgroups. Then, they were subjected to intraabdominal pressures of 0, 6, 9, 12, and 15 mm Hg, respectively. Acute kidney injury was assessed by measuring serum creatinine (Scr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), tubular cell apoptosis, kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) and cysteine-rich 61 (Cyr-61/CCN1) expression. Results: Acute kidney injury with increased tubular apoptosis and KIM-1 and Cyr-61 expression occurred when intraabdominal pressure reached 15, 15 and 9 mm Hg in PN, PM and PS groups, respectively.The Scr and BUN levels were similar in all groups. Conclusions: In rabbits, kidneys with severe hydronephrosis were more likely to suffer acute injury when they were exposed to pneunnoperitoneal pressure. (C) 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available