4.0 Article

CD44s and CD44v6 in Diagnosis and Prognosis of Human Bladder Cancer

Journal

ULTRASTRUCTURAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 145-152

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/01913123.2011.651522

Keywords

CD44s; CD44v6; cell adhesion; immunohistochemistry; squamous cell carcinoma; transitional cell carcinoma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) CD44 standard (CD44s) and its variant 6 (CD44v6) are involved in the progression and invasion of human malignancies. However, discrepancies in the prognostic value of CD44s and CD44v6 expression need to be addressed. Aims: To investigate the expression of CD44s and CD44v6 in bladder carcinomas and relate the results to the established prognostic factors. Materials and Methods: 50 bladder carcinoma specimens, 30 cases with transitional cell carcinoma (TCC: 6 bilharzial and 24 nonbilharzial) and 20 cases with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC: 8 bilharzial and 12 nonbilharzial), were included. Immunohistochemical analysis for CD44s and CD44v6 was carried out using avidin-biotin peroxidase method. Results: The level of both CD44s and CD44v6 in TCC was significantly higher in invasive than in preinvasive tumors and normal urothelium (p < .05). A direct association between the percentage of expression of both markers and the grade of TCC (p < .05) was observed. An inverse correlation between CD44s and SCC was seen, where metaplastic urothelium showed higher expression than invasive carcinomas. No association was observed between the expressions of both CD44s and CD44v6 and bilharzial ova, sex and age of the patient, or size of the tumor. Conclusions: The authors report statistically significant correlation between CD44s and CD44v6 expression and increasing grade and stage of TCC. No such correlation with SCC and with bilharzial cystitis, sex and age of the patient, or size of the tumor was documented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available