Use of IOTA simple rules for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: meta-analysis
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Use of IOTA simple rules for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: meta-analysis
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages 503-514
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2014-06-12
DOI
10.1002/uog.13437
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- OC14.08: IOTA simple rules for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses: a prospective external validation
- (2015) J. Alcazar et al. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
- QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
- (2013) Penny F. Whiting ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Multicentre external validation of IOTA prediction models and RMI by operators with varied training
- (2013) A Sayasneh et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Assessing the reproducibility of the IOTA simple ultrasound rules for classifying adnexal masses as benign or malignant using stored 3D volumes
- (2013) Stefano Guerriero et al. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- A multicenter prospective external validation of the diagnostic performance of IOTA simple descriptors and rules to characterize ovarian masses
- (2013) Ahmad Sayasneh et al. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
- Presurgical diagnosis of adnexal tumours using mathematical models and scoring systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2013) J. Kaijser et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE
- Interobserver agreement in describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules in a real-time setting and using three-dimensional ultrasound volumes and digital clips
- (2013) B. Ruiz de Gauna et al. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
- Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses
- (2012) A. Di Legge et al. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
- Ultrasound criteria and CA 125 as predictive variables of ovarian cancer in women with adnexal tumors
- (2012) C. A. Hartman et al. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
- Improving strategies for diagnosing ovarian cancer: a summary of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) studies
- (2012) J. Kaijser et al. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
- Clinically oriented three-step strategy for assessment of adnexal pathology
- (2012) L. Ameye et al. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
- A randomised controlled trial comparing surgical intervention rates between two protocols for the management of asymptomatic adnexal tumours in postmenopausal women
- (2012) Natalie Nunes et al. BMJ Open
- Validation externe des critères de Timmerman sur une série de 122 tumeurs ovariennes
- (2011) K. Fathallah et al. GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE
- Sonographische Abklärung eines Adnexbefundes
- (2011) H.J. Prömpeler RADIOLOGE
- Basic European ultrasound training in obstetrics and gynecology: where are we and where do we go from here?
- (2010) K. Å. Salvesen et al. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
- Effect of cancer prevalence on the use of risk-assessment cut-off levels and the performance of mathematical models to distinguish malignant from benign adnexal masses
- (2010) A. Daemen et al. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
- Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer
- (2008) D. Timmerman et al. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started