4.6 Article

A unified approach to risk assessment for fetal aneuploidies

Journal

ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages 48-54

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/uog.14694

Keywords

Bayes' theorem; cell-free DNA; fetal fraction; first-trimester screening; nuchal translucency; serum free -hCG; serum PAPP-A; trisomy 13; trisomy 18; trisomy 21

Funding

  1. Fetal Medicine Foundation [1037116]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveTo examine the potential impact of combining measures from cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing with maternal age and first-trimester biomarkers in screening for fetal trisomies. MethodsThis was a theoretical study using Bayes' theorem to combine the a priori risk for fetal trisomy 21 derived from maternal age with likelihoods from nuchal translucency thickness, serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A, serum free -human chorionic gonadotropin and plasma cfDNA. We adopted a binomial counting model for the cfDNA likelihoods and developed a model to account for errors in estimating fetal fraction. ResultsWhen Bayes' theorem was used to combine the a priori risk for trisomy 21 derived from the first-trimester combined test with likelihoods from the cfDNA test, and when the true fetal fraction was known, the detection rate increased from 62% at a fetal fraction of 4% to 100% at a fetal fraction of 9%; the positive likelihood ratio (trisomic/euploid) increased from 620 to 1000 and the negative likelihood ratio (euploid/trisomic) increased from 3 to>10000. When the fetal fraction is<4%, the cfDNA test has traditionally been considered to be a failure, but the cfDNA results can be used to improve the performance of screening by the combined test. ConclusionsIn contingent policies that use the first-trimester combined test for first-line screening to select the subgroup for cfDNA testing, the data from the latter should be used to update the risk from the former. Individual patient results from cfDNA testing depend crucially on the fetal fraction and the precision of its measurement. Copyright (c) 2014 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available