4.6 Article

Fetal growth trajectories in Type-1 diabetic pregnancy

Journal

ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages 735-742

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/uog.7700

Keywords

abdominal circumference; fetal growth; glucose control; macrosomia; Type-1 diabetes mellitus; ultrasound

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To describe the individual intrauterine growth patterns of fetuses of insulin-dependent (Type-1) diabetic women and to examine determinants of overgrowth (macrosomia) and its timing. Methods This retrospective longitudinal study examined the developmental trajectories of fetal abdominal circumference (AC) and biparietal diameter in 76 Type-1 diabetic women with singleton pregnancies. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with a shared fetal AC growth trajectory. Subsequently, maternal factors, including glycemic control as assessed by glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), were examined to see whether they bad any effect on fetal growth. Resutts Four subgroups with different AC growth patterns were identified. Differences in birth weight between the distinct subgroups were related to the shape of the AC growth velocity curve over gestation. Acceleration of AC growth commencing before or after 25 weeks' gestation was associated with the birth of a beau:, or large-for-dates baby in 94 and 56% of cases, respectively. Poor glycemic control (HbA1c > 7.0%) during the periconception period or before 12 weeks' gestation was a modest predictor of midtrimester growth in AC. Other diabetes-related factors, fetal sex, parity, or maternal weight/obesity were unrelated to the fetal growth pattern. Conclusion The findings suggest that an individual fetus's growth trajectory is set early in gestation and that the contemporaneous degree of maternal glycemia plays a role in determining birth weight. Copyright (C) 2010 ISUOC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available