4.1 Article

Significant association between cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4+49G>A polymorphism and risk of malignant bone tumors

Journal

TUMOR BIOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages 3371-3375

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13277-013-0908-7

Keywords

Osteosarcoma; Ewing's sarcoma; Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) gene +49G > A polymorphism was implicated to be associated with risk of malignant bone tumors, but the finding was inconclusive owing to the limited sample of a single study. The objective of the current study was to conduct a pooled analysis of four previously published studies to investigate the association between CTLA-4 +49G > A polymorphism and the risk of malignant bone tumors. Data were extracted, and the pooled odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) was calculated to assess the association. Those four published studies included a total of 2,165 subjects. The pooled results indicated that CTLA-4 +49G > A polymorphism was significantly associated with risk of malignant bone tumors (AA versus GG: OR = 2.24, 95 % CI 1.67-2.99, P < 0.001; AA/GA versus GG: OR = 1.35, 95 % CI 1.14-1.61, P = 0.001; AA versus GG/GA: OR = 2.00, 95 % CI 1.53-2.62, P < 0.001). Stratified analyses by tumor type showed that CTLA-4 +49G > A polymorphism was associated with risks of both osteosarcoma (AA versus GG: OR = 2.23, 95 % CI 1.45-3.43, P < 0.001; AA/GA versus GG: OR = 1.35, 95 % CI 1.04-1.75, P = 0.024; AA versus GG/GA: OR = 2.00, 95 % CI 1.34-2.98, P = 0.001) and Ewing's sarcoma (AA versus GG: OR = 2.24, 95 % CI 1.51-3.31, P < 0.001; AA/GA versus GG: OR = 1.36, 95 % CI 1.07-1.72, P = 0.011; AA versus GG/GA: OR = 2.01, 95 % CI 1.39-2.89, P < 0.001). Therefore, results from the current pooled analysis suggest that CTLA-4 +49G > A polymorphism is associated with risk of malignant bone tumors, including osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available