4.2 Article

Ability of Cricetomys rats to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis and discriminate it from other microorganisms

Journal

TUBERCULOSIS
Volume 92, Issue 2, Pages 182-186

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.tube.2011.11.008

Keywords

Tuberculosis diagnosis; Nontuberculous mycobacteria; Growth phase; Volatile compounds

Funding

  1. UBS Optimus Foundation (UBS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Trained African giant pouched rats (Cricetomys gambianus) have potential for diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB). These rats target volatile compounds of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) that cause TB. Mtb and nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) species are related to Nocardia and Rhodococcus spp., which are also acid-fast bacilli and can be misdiagnosed as Mtb in smear microscopy. Diagnostic performance of C. gambianus on in vitro-cultured mycobacterial and related pulmonary microbes is unknown. This study reports on the response of TB detection rats to cultures of reference Mtb, clinical Mtb, NTM, Nocardia; Rhodococcus; Streptomyces; Bacillus; and yeasts. Trained rats significantly discriminated Mtb from other microbes (p < 0.008, Fisher's exact test). Detection of Mtb cultures was age-related, with exponential and early stationary phase detected more frequently than early log phase and late stationary phase (p < 0.001, Fisher's test) (sensitivity -83.33%, specificity -94.4%, accuracy -94%). The detection of naturally TB-infected sputum exceeded that of negative sputum mixed with Mtb, indicating that C. gambianus are conditioned to detect odours of TB-positive sputum better than spiked sputum. Although further studies on volatiles from detectable growth phases of Mtb are vital for identification of Mtb-specific volatiles detected by rats, our study underline the potential of C. gambianus for TB diagnosis. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available