4.3 Article

Estimates of the burden of malaria morbidity in Africa in children under the age of 5 years

Journal

TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages 771-783

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02076.x

Keywords

child health; malaria; morbidity; epidemiology; sub-Saharan Africa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE To estimate the direct burden of malaria among children younger than 5 years in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) for the year 2000, as part of a wider initiative on burden estimates. METHODS A systematic literature review was undertaken in June 2003. Severe malaria outcomes (cerebral malaria, severe malarial anaemia and respiratory distress) and non-severe malaria data were abstracted separately, together with information on the characteristics of each study and its population. Population characteristics were also collated at a national level. A meta-regression model was used to predict the incidence of malaria fevers at a national level. For severe outcomes, results were presented as median rates as data were too sparse for modelling. RESULTS For the year 2000, an estimated 545 000 (uncertainty interval: 105 000-1 750 000) children under the age of 5 in SSA experienced an episode of severe malaria for which they were admitted to hospital. A total of 24 000 (interquartile range: 12 000-37 000) suffered from persistent neurological deficits as a result of cerebral malaria. The number of malaria fevers associated with high parasite density in under-5s in SSA in 2000 was estimated as 115 750 000 (uncertainty interval: 91 243 000-257 957 000). CONCLUSION Our study predicts a lower burden than previous estimates of under-5 malaria morbidity in SSA. As there is a lack of suitable data to enable comprehensive estimates of annual malaria incidence, we describe the information needed to improve the validity of future estimates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available