4.5 Article

A Friction Evaluation Method Based on Barrel Compression Test

Journal

TRIBOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 51, Issue 3, Pages 525-535

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11249-013-0164-4

Keywords

Friction test methods; Forming; Non-ferrous alloys; Barreling

Funding

  1. Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of National Natural Science Foundation of China [51221004]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50930005, 51175460]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [Z1090373]
  4. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20110101110011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To further understand the tribological performance in metal forming, it is critical to accurately evaluate the friction between tool and workpiece. However, the unclear contact conditions at the interfaces and the complex mechanisms of the tribology lead to challenges to assess friction in metal forming processes. In this study, a friction evaluation method by the barrel compression test and its principle model were proposed based on the theoretical analysis and the numerical simulations. Besides the friction factor at the die-specimen interfaces and the initial aspect ratio of the specimen, the strain hardening exponent of the specimen was found to affect the barreling profiles based on the theoretical analysis. Furthermore, the effects of the three influencing factors, including the friction factor at the interfaces, the initial aspect ratio and the strain hardening exponent of the specimen, on the defined barreling factor were numerically analyzed by the finite element method. A predictive model of the barreling factor accounting for these three factors was developed. A friction evaluation method, proposed based on this model, was implemented by various cylinder compression experiments of CuZn40 brass. The method proposed in this study provided a convenient means to identify the contact friction in metal forming processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available