4.5 Article

On the Validity of the Method of Reduction of Dimensionality: Area of Contact, Average Interfacial Separation and Contact Stiffness

Journal

TRIBOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages 223-229

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11249-013-0208-9

Keywords

Contact mechanics; Contact area; Contact stiffness; Randomly rough surfaces; Method of reduction of dimensionality

Funding

  1. European Commission [Marie-Curie IOF-272619]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has recently been suggested that many contact mechanics problems between solids can be accurately studied by mapping the problem on an effective one-dimensional (1D) elastic foundation model. Using this 1D mapping, we calculate the contact area and the average interfacial separation between elastic solids with nominally flat but randomly rough surfaces. We show, by comparison to exact numerical results, that the 1D mapping method fails even qualitatively. We also calculate the normal interfacial stiffness K and compare it with the result of an analytic study. We attribute the failure of the elastic foundation model to the incorrect treatment of the long-range elastic coupling between the asperity contact regions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available