A core outcome set for clinical trials on non-specific low back pain: study protocol for the development of a core domain set
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
A core outcome set for clinical trials on non-specific low back pain: study protocol for the development of a core domain set
Authors
Keywords
Non-specific low back pain, Core outcome set, Domains, Clinical trials, Efficacy, Effectiveness, Health interventions
Journal
Trials
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2015-06-18
DOI
10.1186/1745-6215-15-511
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0
- (2014) Maarten Boers et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Can We Decide Which Outcomes Should Be Measured in Every Clinical Trial? A Scoping Review of the Existing Conceptual Frameworks and Processes to Develop Core Outcome Sets
- (2014) L. Idzerda et al. JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
- Report of the NIH Task Force on Research Standards for Chronic Low Back Pain
- (2014) Richard A. Deyo et al. SPINE
- The CONSENSUS study: protocol for a mixed methods study to establish which outcomes should be included in a core outcome set for oropharyngeal cancer
- (2014) Aoife MI Waters et al. Trials
- Developing core outcomes sets: methods for identifying and including patient-reported outcomes (PROs)
- (2014) Rhiannon C Macefield et al. Trials
- Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a ‘core outcome set’
- (2014) Cecilia A C Prinsen et al. Trials
- Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups
- (2013) Jamie J Kirkham et al. Trials
- MOMENT – Management of Otitis Media with Effusion in Cleft Palate: protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey
- (2013) Nicola L Harman et al. Trials
- Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010
- (2012) Theo Vos et al. LANCET
- Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider
- (2012) Paula R Williamson et al. Trials
- Non-specific low back pain
- (2011) Federico Balagué et al. LANCET
- A validity-driven approach to the understanding of the personal and societal burden of low back pain: development of a conceptual and measurement model
- (2011) Rachelle Buchbinder et al. ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY
- Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing Studies
- (2011) Ian P. Sinha et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes
- (2010) Lidwine B. Mokkink et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Low back pain symptoms show a similar pattern of improvement following a wide range of primary care treatments: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials
- (2010) Majid Artus et al. RHEUMATOLOGY
- 2009 Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group
- (2009) Andrea D. Furlan et al. SPINE
- A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally
- (2008) Simon Dagenais et al. Spine Journal
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started