Intervention description is not enough: evidence from an in-depth multiple case study on the untold role and impact of context in randomised controlled trials of seven complex interventions
Published 2012 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Intervention description is not enough: evidence from an in-depth multiple case study on the untold role and impact of context in randomised controlled trials of seven complex interventions
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Trials
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2012-06-29
DOI
10.1186/1745-6215-13-95
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration
- (2013) Isabelle Boutron et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- The case study approach
- (2011) Sarah Crowe et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Evidence, theory and context - using intervention mapping to develop a school-based intervention to prevent obesity in children
- (2011) Jennifer J Lloyd et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
- Using a business model approach and marketing techniques for recruitment to clinical trials
- (2011) Alison M McDonald et al. Trials
- Challenges of maintaining research protocol fidelity in a clinical care setting: A qualitative study of the experiences and views of patients and staff participating in a randomized controlled trial
- (2011) Julia Lawton et al. Trials
- Why did an effective Dutch complex psycho-social intervention for people with dementia not work in the German healthcare context? Lessons learnt from a process evaluation alongside a multicentre RCT
- (2011) S. Voigt-Radloff et al. BMJ Open
- Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions
- (2010) Elizabeth Murray et al. BMC Medicine
- CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
- (2010) Kenneth F Schulz et al. Trials
- Using process evaluation for program improvement in dose, fidelity and reach: the ACT trial experience
- (2009) Dawn K Wilson et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
- Why we will remain pragmatists: four problems with the impractical mechanistic framework and a better solution
- (2009) Andrew D. Oxman et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Against pragmatism: on efficacy, effectiveness and the real world
- (2009) David M Kent et al. Trials
- Why do interventions work in some places and not others: A breastfeeding support group trial
- (2009) Pat Hoddinott et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
- (2008) James Thomas et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions.
- (2008) Charles Abraham et al. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
- A new 'Mechanistic-Practical” Framework for designing and interpreting randomized trials
- (2008) Paul J. Karanicolas et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
- (2008) Peter Craig et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now