4.6 Article

Hydrothermal Carbonization of Digestate in the Presence of Zeolite: Process Efficiency and Composite Properties

Journal

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages 2967-2974

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00943

Keywords

Biochar; Biogas; Carbon-mineral composites; Catalysis; NMR; Proximate analysis; Porosity

Funding

  1. Marie Curie fellowship [661323]
  2. Western Sun Grant Initiatives, United States [C0432G-C]
  3. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [661323] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A systematic experimental study on hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of digestate was conducted to evaluate the catalytic impact of natural zeolite and the properties of the produced hydrochar-zeolite composites (HZCs). An agricultural digestate and, as reference, microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) were treated at HTC temperatures of 190, 230, and 270 degrees C. HZCs were analyzed for their elemental composition, NMR structural properties, thermogravimetric behavior, N-2 adsorption porosity, and scanning electron microscopy morphology. The results indicate distinct catalytic effects of zeolite on carbonization. For digestate, catalytic effects of zeolite increased the degree of carbonization equally to a 9-29 K higher HTC temperature. Zeolite increased the energy and carbon recovery in solid products for digestate, whereas MCC showed a lower recovery. Interestingly, zeolite preserved the cellulose fraction of digestate. This was attributed to physical and chemical shielding by formation of a visible zeolite layer on organic particles. Compared to pure hydrochar, the HZCs showed less aromatic and thermally stable carbon but higher surface area and pore volume. Potential areas of applications for the HZCs range from energetic use (e.g., gasification) to soil amendment and additive in bioprocesses (e.g., growing media).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available