4.4 Article

Numerical Simulations of the Thermal Impact of Supercritical CO2 Injection on Chemical Reactivity in a Carbonate Saline Reservoir

Journal

TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA
Volume 82, Issue 1, Pages 247-274

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11242-009-9474-2

Keywords

Coupled modelling; Supercritical CO2; Saline reservoir; Joule-Thomson effect; Geochemical reactivity

Funding

  1. French National Agency for Research (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Geological sequestration of CO2 offers a promising solution for reducing net emissions of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. This emerging technology must make it possible to inject CO2 into deep saline aquifers or oil- and gas-depleted reservoirs in the supercritical state (P > 7.4MPa and T > 31.1A degrees C) to achieve a higher density and therefore occupy less volume underground. Previous experimental and numerical simulations have demonstrated that massive CO2 injection in saline reservoirs causes a major disequilibrium of the physical and geochemical characteristics of the host aquifer. The near-well injection zone seems to constitute an underground hydrogeological system particularly impacted by supercritical CO2 injection and the most sensitive area, where chemical phenomena (e.g. mineral dissolution/precipitation) can have a major impact on the porosity and permeability. Furthermore, these phenomena are highly sensitive to temperature. This study, based on numerical multi-phase simulations, investigates thermal effects during CO2 injection into a deep carbonate formation. Different thermal processes and their influence on the chemical and mineral reactivity of the saline reservoir are discussed. This study underlines both the minor effects of intrinsic thermal and thermodynamic processes on mineral reactivity in carbonate aquifers, and the influence of anthropic thermal processes (e.g. injection temperature) on the carbonates' behaviour.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available