4.1 Article

Adenosine Receptor Expression in the Development of Renal Fibrosis Following Ischemic Injury

Journal

TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS
Volume 46, Issue 10, Pages 3257-3261

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.09.151

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Long-term renal allograft survival has not improved despite improvements in short term outcomes. Graft loss is characterized histologically by the development of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA). Mechanisms underlying the development of IFTA are multifactorial and include ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Therapeutic options to reduce IFTA include management of immunologic causes, such as rejection, but despite these efforts IFTA can still occur and leads to the inexorable destruction of the transplanted kidney. The adenosine A(2B) receptor (A(2B)R) has recently been implicated in the development of renal fibrosis. We performed an observational study to examine the mRNA expression of the adenosine receptors after renal ischemia up to the development of renal fibrosis in a mouse model of unilateral IRI. A(2B)R was the only adenosine receptor that showed elevated expression following ischemia until the development of renal fibrosis 4 weeks after injury. At 2 weeks after ischemia, increased expression of the fibrotic markers transforming growth factor beta and Collagen-1 alpha was observed. Expression of hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha and endothelin-1, which lie downstream of A(2B)R activation and have been recognized to promote renal fibrosis, were also significantly up-regulated at 2 weeks after ischemia. Expression of fibrotic markers returned to baseline by 4 weeks after ischemia, indicating resolution of injury with the concurrent development of renal fibrosis and reduced renal function. Our data suggest that A(2B)R may be a therapeutic target in reducing the development of renal fibrosis after ischemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available