4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

Corticosteroids Do Not Reverse the Inhibitory Effect of Cyclosporine on Regulatory T-Cell Activity in Contrast to Mycophenolate Mofetil

Journal

TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS
Volume 44, Issue 9, Pages 2834-2839

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.09.091

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Inevitable hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation, a major barrier to survival of the transplanted liver may be promoted by immunosuppression and by CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells (Treg). Treg cells are essential for the induction and maintenance of immunologic self-tolerance as well as transplant tolerance. Moreover, we have previously described low doses of cyclosporine (CsA) to inhibit Treg activity by inducing interleukin-2 and interfron-gamma. We investigated here in, the effect of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids, usually used in combination with a calcineurin inhibitor on human CD4(+)CD25(+) Treg cells. Methods. Human CD4(+)CD25(+) cells isolated from healthy donors were cultured in the presence of CsA +/- corticoids or MMF. Suppressive activity of regulatory T cells was assessed in mixed leukocyte reactions including CD25(+) solvents with autologous activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Results. MMF and dexamethasone inhibited PBMC and Treg proliferation in dose-dependent fashing, maintaining the suppressive activity of Treg cells. However, the association of corticoids with CsA could not reverse the inhibitory effects of CsA on Treg activity, unlike the MMF and CsA combination. Conclusion. We have previously shown CsA to significantly impair the function of CD4(+)CD25(+) Treg cells. Herein we reports that corticoids were not able to reverse this effect, whereas MMF couterbalanced it, suggesting that the combination of MMF with CsA maintains regulatory T cells activity promoting tolerance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available