4.2 Article

Humoral and cellular immune monitoring might be useful to identify liver transplant recipients at risk for development of infection

Journal

TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages 396-402

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2008.00329.x

Keywords

liver transplantation; hypergammaglobulinemia; complement; infection; risk factors; immune monitoring

Funding

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [FIS05/0839]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

J. Carbone, D. Micheloud, M. Salcedo, D. Rincon, R. Banares, G. Clemente, J. Jensen, E. Sarmiento, J. Rodriguez-Molina, E. Fernandez-Cruz. Humoral and cellular immune monitoring might be useful to identify liver transplant recipients at risk for development of infection.Transpl Infect Dis 2008: 10: 396-402 Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is a successful therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease, and infection remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality for patients undergoing this procedure. To assess humoral and cellular immunity markers as potential risk factors for development of infection, 46 consecutive liver transplant recipients (hepatitis C virus cirrhosis [n=17], alcoholic liver disease [n=15], hepatocellular carcinoma [n=9], autoimmune hepatitis [n=2], and other [n=3]) performed at a single center were prospectively studied. Maintenance therapy included tacrolimus (n=37) or cyclosporine (n=9) and prednisone. During follow-up, 27 patients had at least 1 episode of infection (58.7%). Pre-OLT immunoglobulin G (IgG) hypergammaglobulinemia (relative risk [RR] 2.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-6.60, P=0.02), pre-OLT IgA hypergammaglobulinemia (RR 2.77, CI=1.24-6.19, P=0.012), and pre-OLT C3 hypocomplementemia (RR 3.02, CI=1.21-7.55, P=0.018) were associated with an increased risk for development of infection. Monitoring of Ig and complement levels might help to identify the risk of developing infection in OLT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available