4.7 Article

Remote Sensing Observation of Particulate Organic Carbon in the Pearl River Estuary

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 7, Issue 7, Pages 8683-8704

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs70708683

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program (973 Program) of China [2015CB954002]
  2. Public Science and Technology Research Fund Projects for Ocean Research [201505003]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41476155, 41322039, 41271378]
  4. Global Change and Air-Sea Interaction project of China [GASI-03-03-01-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

River estuaries are connectors of terrestrial and marine ecosystems. Riverine particulate organic carbon (POC) is discharged into oceans after a series of biogeochemical reactions in estuaries. Satellite monitoring of POC will improve our understanding of the carbon dynamics of these water bodies. Based on in situ data from four seasonal survey cruises, we developed an algorithm for estimating POC concentrations in the Pearl River Estuary (PRE). Reflectance ratios, Rrs(678)/Rrs(488) and Rrs(748)/Rrs(412), were set as inputs to calculate POC concentration in the PRE. The algorithm was then applied to MODIS/AQUA data to inverse POC concentrations in the PRE from 2002 to 2014. Additionally, sources, impact factors, and seasonal distributions of POC were also investigated. Phytoplankton contributed more to POC in off-shore waters than that in in-shore waters in autumn and spring, but showed the opposite pattern in winter. Under the influence of freshwater from the Pearl River, underwater topography, tides, winds, etc., the seasonal POC concentrations along a specific section, vertical to water depth gradient, decreased in different seasons. These decreases could be described by exponential functions (y = ae(bx), b < 0). The distribution of POC concentrations in the PRE resulted from complex physical and biogeochemical processes, which can change spatially and seasonally.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available