4.2 Article

Implications of demographics on future blood supply: a population-based cross-sectional study

Journal

TRANSFUSION
Volume 51, Issue 4, Pages 702-709

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02882.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Sozialminister Herrn E. Sellering (Secretary of Social Affairs) of Mecklenburg-Pomerania
  2. President of the Landesarztekammer (Board of Physicians) Mecklenburg-Pomerania Herrn Dr Crusius
  3. Krankenhausgesellschaft (Hospital Society) Mecklenburg-Pomerania
  4. AMEOS-Diakonie-Klinikum Ueckermunde
  5. ASKLEPIOS Klinik Parchim
  6. ASKLEPIOS Klinik Pasewalk GmbH
  7. Bodden-Kliniken Ribnitz-Damgarten GmbH
  8. Dietrich-Bonhoeffer-Klinikum Neubrandenburg
  9. DRK-Krankenhaus Grevesmuhlen gGmbH
  10. DRK-Krankenhaus Grimmen GmbH
  11. DRK-Krankenhaus Mecklenburg-Strelitz gGmbH
  12. DRK-Krankenhaus Teterow gGmbH
  13. Universitatsklinikum Greifswald der Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universitat Greifswald
  14. Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethanien gGmbH in Greifswald
  15. HANSE-Klinikum Stralsund GmbH
  16. HELIOS Kliniken Schwerin
  17. Medigreif Unternehmensgruppe Integratives Gesundheitszentrum Boizenburg
  18. Tagesklinik fur Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie
  19. Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie in Rostock
  20. Lungenklinik Amsee in Waren an der Muritz
  21. Universitatsklinikum Rostock
  22. Klinikum Karlsburg-Herz-und Diabeteszentrum Mecklenburg-Pomerania
  23. Klinikum Sudstadt Rostock
  24. KMG Klinikum Gustrow GmbH
  25. MediClin Krankenhaus am Crivitzer See in Crivitz
  26. Krankenhaus Bad Doberan GmbH
  27. Krankenhaus Malchin GmbH
  28. MediClin Krankenhaus Plau am See
  29. Kreiskrankenhaus Demmin
  30. Kreiskrankenhaus Hagenow
  31. Kreiskrankenhaus Wolgast gGmbH
  32. MediClin Muritz Klinikum in Waren an der Muritz
  33. Neurologisches Rehabilitationszentrum Greifswald gGmbH
  34. Sana-Krankenhaus Rugen GmbH in Bergen
  35. Evangelisches Krankenhaus Stift Bethlehem gGmbH in Ludwigslust
  36. HANSE-Klinikum Wismar
  37. Tagesklinik fur Psychiatrie/Psychotherapie in Rostock
  38. Warnow-Klinik Butzow gGmbH
  39. Red Cross Blood Donation Service Mecklenburg-Pomerania Herrn Dr Stangenberg

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Data on blood recipients are sparse and unconnected to data on blood donors. The objective was to analyze the impact of the demographic change on future blood demand and supply in a German federal state. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional study was conducted. For all in-hospital transfused red blood cells (RBCs; n = 95,477), in the German federal state Mecklenburg-Pomerania in 2005, characteristics of the patient and the blood donor (118,406 blood donations) were obtained. Population data were used to predict blood demand and supply until 2020. RESULTS: By 2020 the population increase of those aged 65 years or more (+26.4%) in Mecklenburg-Pomerania will be paralleled by a decrease of the potential donor population (18-68 years; -16.1%). Assuming stable rates per age group until 2020, the demand for in-hospital blood transfusions will increase by approximately 25% (24,000 RBC units) while blood donations will decrease by approximately 27% (32,000 RBC units). The resulting, predicted shortfall is 47% of demand for in-hospital patients (56,000 RBC units). Validation using historical data (1997-2007) showed that the model predicted the RBC demand with a deviation of only 1.2%. Demographic changes are particularly pronounced in former East Germany, but by 2030 most European countries will face a similar situation. The decrease of younger age groups requires an increase of blood donation rates and interdisciplinary approaches to reduce the need for transfusion to maintain sufficient blood supply. CONCLUSIONS: Demography is a major determinant of future transfusion demand. All efforts should be made by Western societies to systematically obtain data on blood donors and recipients to develop strategies to meet future blood demand.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available