4.3 Article

A Human Body Model With Active Muscles for Simulation of Pretensioned Restraints in Autonomous Braking Interventions

Journal

TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 304-313

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2014.931949

Keywords

finite element; seat belt pretension; feedback control; occupant kinematics; active muscle; human body model

Funding

  1. VINNOVA, the Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems as part of the FFI Vehicle and Traffic Safety research programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The aim of this work is to study driver and passenger kinematics in autonomous braking scenarios, with and without pretensioned seat belts, using a whole-body finite element (FE) human body model (HBM) with active muscles. Methods: Upper extremity musculature for elbow and shoulder flexion-extension feedback control was added to an HBM that was previously complemented with feedback controlled muscles for the trunk and neck. Controller gains were found using a radial basis function metamodel sampled by making 144 simulations of an 8ms(-2) volunteer sled test. The HBM kinematics, interaction forces, and muscle activations were validated using a second volunteer data set for the passenger and driver positions, with and without 170N seat belt pretension, in 11ms(-2) autonomous braking deceleration. The HBM was then used for a parameter study in which seat belt pretension force and timing were varied from 170 to 570N and from 0.25s before to 0.15s after deceleration onset, in an 11ms(-2) autonomous braking scenario. Results: The model validation showed that the forward displacements and interaction forces of the HBM correlated with those of corresponding volunteer tests. Muscle activations and head rotation angles were overestimated in the HBM when compared with volunteer data. With a standard seat belt in 11ms(-2) autonomous braking interventions, the HBM exhibited peak forward head displacements of 153 and 232mm for the driver and passenger positions. When 570N seat belt pretension was applied 0.15s before deceleration onset, a reduction of peak head displacements to 60 and 75mm was predicted. Conclusions: Driver and passenger responses to autonomous braking with standard and pretensioned restraints were successfully modeled in a whole-body FE HBM with feedback controlled active muscles. Variations of belt pretension force level and timing revealed that belt pretension 0.15s before deceleration onset had the largest effect in reducing forward head and torso movement caused by the autonomous brake intervention. The displacement of the head relative to the torso for the HBM is quite constant for all variations in timing and belt force; it is the reduced torso displacements that lead to reduced forward head displacements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available