4.4 Article

Modeling Fusion/Fission-Dependent Intracellular Transport of Fluid Phase Markers

Journal

TRAFFIC
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages 1001-1015

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2010.01067.x

Keywords

fluid phase transport; intracellular transport; membrane domains; membrane fission; membrane fusion; Rab proteins; sorting

Categories

Funding

  1. CONICET
  2. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A fundamental feature of eukaryotic cells is the presence of distinct membrane-bound compartments having unique protein and lipid composition. These compartments are interconnected by active trafficking mechanisms that must direct macromolecules to defined locations, and at the same time maintain the protein and lipid composition of each organelle. It is well accepted that Rab proteins play a central role in intracellular transport regulating the recognition, fusion and fission of organelles. However, how the transport is achieved is not completely understood. We propose a model whereby a soluble component in the luminal compartment is transported along different Rab-containing organelles that interact according to the following simple principles: (i) only organelles with the same or compatible Rab membrane domains can fuse; (ii) after fusion, an asymmetric fission occurs producing a tubule and a round-shaped vesicle; and (iii) Rab membrane domains distribute asymmetrically between the two resulting organelles. When this model was tested in a simulation, efficient unidirectional transport was observed, while the compartment identity was preserved. All three principles were absolutely necessary for transport. The model is compatible with Rab association/dissociation dynamics and with Rab conversion. In simulations mimicking a simplified endocytic pathway, soluble and membrane-associated markers were efficiently transported preserving the identity of the interacting compartments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available