4.4 Article

Cyanobacterial cytotoxicity versus toxicity to brine shrimp Artemia salina

Journal

TOXICON
Volume 57, Issue 1, Pages 76-83

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2010.10.002

Keywords

Secondary metabolites; Brine shrimp bioassay; Health risk assessment; Cytotoxicity; Defense

Funding

  1. European territorial cooperation [BIOPHARM M00140]
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [3491/2005, MSM 6007 665 808, MSMT 1MO571, MSM 6007665801]
  3. ISB [AV0Z60660521]
  4. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [P504/10/1501]
  5. [AVOZ50200510]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heterocytous cyanobacteria from various habitats were screened for toxicity to brine shrimp Artemia salina and the murine lymphoblastic cell line Sp/2 in order to compare these two testing models for evaluation of risk posed by cyanobacteria to human health. Methanol extracts of biomass and cultivation media were tested for toxicity and selected extracts were fractionated to determine the active fraction. We found a significant toxic effect to A. sauna and to Sp/2 cells in 5.2% and 31% of studied extracts, respectively. Only 8.6% of the tested strains were highly toxic to both A. sauna and the Sp/2 cell line, and only two of the tested strains were toxic to A. sauna and not to the murine cell line. Therefore, it is likely that the toxic effect of cyanobacterial secondary metabolites mostly targets basal metabolic pathways present in mammal cells and so is not manifested in A. sauna. We conclude that it is insufficient to monitor cytotoxicity of cyanobacteria using only the brine shrimp bioassay as was usual in the past, since cytotoxicity is a more frequent feature in cyanobacteria in comparison with toxicity to A. sauna. A. salina toxicity test should not be used when estimating the possible health risk for humans. We suggest that in vitro mammal cells be used for these purposes. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available