4.2 Article

Comparison of the effect of chronic cadmium exposure on the antioxidant defense systems of kidney and brain in rat

Journal

TOXICOLOGY MECHANISMS AND METHODS
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 329-336

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/15376516.2012.757687

Keywords

Antioxidant defense system; cadmium (Cd2+); chronic exposure; free radicals; oxidative damage

Categories

Funding

  1. CONACYT [132353, 84119]
  2. Pfizer
  3. ICyTDF [2010/344, 2011/276/279, PIRIVE09-9]
  4. COFAA-SIP/IPN [20110619/0786/1112/3893, 20121109/1242]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cadmium (Cd2+) produces toxic effects on various tissues as kidney and liver, so several studies have focused to explore the effect produced by different doses and exposure times of this metal. However, little has been reported about the effect that Cd2+ shows in the brain in vivo. Hence, this study aimed at comparing the effect of chronic Cd2+ exposure on antioxidant defense systems of kidney and brain in rats. Six groups of male rats were employed; five were administered for 45 days with different doses of cadmium chloride (0.187, 0.375, 0.562, 0.937 and 1.125 mg/kg; i.p.) and the other was used as control. Free radicals (FRs) were directly quantified by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy; malondialdehyde (MDA), reduced glutathione (GSH) and the activity expression of superoxide dismutase (SOD2) and catalase (CAT) were also measured. The EPR results showed that there was no increase in FR content in kidney or brain. MDA and GSH levels increased in kidney but not in the brain. The SOD2 activity was not altered, but its expression decreased in both tissues. On the other hand, CAT activity and expression tended to increase at low doses and decrease at high doses in both tissues. Therefore, these results suggest that there exist compensatory mechanisms in both kidney and brain that are capable of avoiding the toxic effects exerted by Cd2+ at these doses and exposure time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available