4.5 Article

Comparative metabolism of benfuracarb in in vitro mammalian hepatic microsomes model and its implications for chemical risk assessment

Journal

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 224, Issue 2, Pages 290-299

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.08.009

Keywords

Pesticides; Toxicokinetics; P450; In vitro metabolism; Risk assessment

Categories

Funding

  1. European Community [226534-ArcRisk]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In vitro metabolism of benfuracarb in liver microsomes from seven species was studied in order to quantitate species-specific metabolic profiles and enhance benfuracarb risk assessment by interspecies comparisons. Using LC-MS/MS, a total of seven phase-I-metabolites were detected from the extracted chromatograms and six of them were unequivocally identified. Benfuracarb was metabolized via two metabolic pathways, the sulfur oxidation pathway and nitrogen sulfur bond cleavage, yielding carbofuran, which metabolized further. Analysis of the metabolic profiles showed that benfuracarb was extensively metabolized with roughly similar profiles in different species in vitro. In vitro intrinsic clearance rates as well as calculated in vivo hepatic clearances indicated that all seven species metabolize benfuracarb via the carbofuran metabolic pathway more rapidly than the sulfoxidation pathway. The highest interspecies differences in hepatic clearance rate values were for mouse and rat liver microsomes compared to human, i.e. 4.8 and 4.1-fold higher, as illustrated by in vivo hepatic clearance of carbofuran. Overall, there are quantitative interspecies differences in the metabolic profiles and kinetics of benfuracarb biotransformation. These findings illustrate that in vitro studies of benfuracarb metabolite profiles and toxicokinetics are helpful for the proper selection and interpretation of animal models for toxicological evaluation and chemical risk assessment. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available