4.5 Article

Pyrethroid Treatment of Cattle for Tsetse Control: Reducing Its Impact on Dung Fauna

Journal

PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003560

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DFID Animal Health Programme [R7539, R7987]
  2. DFID/RCUK programme on Zoonoses and Emerging Livestock Systems (ZELS, BBSRC) [BB/L019035/1]
  3. ICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR)
  4. BBSRC [BB/L019035/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L019035/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background African trypansomiases of humans and animals can be controlled by attacking the vectors, various species of tsetse fly. Treatment of cattle with pyrethroids to kill tsetse as they feed is the most cost-effective method. However, such treatments can contaminate cattle dung, thereby killing the fauna which disperse the dung and so play an important role in soil fertility. Hence there is a need to identify cost-effective methods of treating cattle with minimal impact on dung fauna. Methodology/Principal Findings We used dung beetles to field bioassay the levels of dung contamination following the use of spray and pour-on formulations of deltamethrin, applied to various parts of the body of cattle in Zimbabwe. Results suggested that dung was contaminated by contact with insecticide on the body surface as the cattle defecated, and by ingestion of insecticide as the cattle licked themselves. Death of dung beetles was reduced to negligible levels by using only the spray and applying it to the legs and belly or legs alone, i.e., places where most tsetse feed. Conclusion/Significance The restricted applications suitable for minimising the impact on dung fauna have the collateral benefits of improving the economy and convenience of cattle treatments for tsetse control. The demonstration of collateral benefits is one of the surest ways of promoting environmentally friendly procedures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available