4.5 Article

Towards high-throughput identification of endocrine disrupting compounds with mass spectrometry

Journal

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 704-709

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.02.004

Keywords

Mass spectrometry; Endocrine disrupting compounds; Identification; MALDI; Automated sample preparation

Categories

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [4050-104373, 200020-111831]
  2. European Project [QLG2-CT2002-00988, 031220]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-mass matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) combined with chemical cross-linking has the ability to monitor the ligand-dependent dimerization of the human estrogen receptor alpha ligand binding domain (hER alpha LBD) in solution. Because only ER ligands enhance the homodimer abundance, we evaluated the ability of this label-free approach for identifying endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) in a high-throughput manner. This was achieved by combining an automated liquid handler with an automated MS acquisition procedure, which allowed a five-fold gain in operator time compared to a fully manual approach. To detect ligand binding with enough confidence, the receptor has to be incubated with at least a 10 mu M concentration of the test compound. Based on the increase of the measured homodimer intensity, eight compounds with a relative binding affinity (RBA, relative to the natural hormone estradiol) >7% were identified as ER ligands among the 28 chemicals tested. Two other compounds, quercetin and 4-tert-amylphenol, were also identified as ER ligands, although their RBAs have been reported to be only 0.01% and 0.000055%, respectively. This suggests that these two ligands have a higher affinity for hER alpha LBD than reported in the literature. The high-mass MALDI approach thus allows identifying high affinity EDCs in an efficient way. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available