4.2 Article

Time to Rethink Long-Term Rehabilitation Management of Stroke Patients

Journal

TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages 457-462

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1310/tsr1906-457

Keywords

chronic stroke; recovery; rehabilitation

Categories

Funding

  1. Canadian Stroke Network

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: It has long been assumed that stroke patients plateau in their recovery within 3 to 6 months of their stroke, and evidence for rehabilitation during the chronic stage is limited. As a consequence, rehabilitation resources for the management of chronic stroke are minimal. Objective: The primary objective was to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) across the continuum of stroke rehabilitation for interventions initiated 6 months or more following the onset of stroke. The secondary objective was to determine whether treatments provided post 6 months are effective in improving outcomes among stroke survivors. Methods: Multiple databases were used to identify all RCTs published from 1970 to June 2012 in the English language where the stroke rehabilitation interventions were initiated more than 6 months after the onset of the stroke. Data abstraction was performed using a standardized data abstraction form that included general citation information, study participant characteristics, methodology, outcomes assessed, and overall findings. Results: The results of our analysis revealed 339 RCTs. The mean number of subjects per study was 73. Two hundred fifty-six RCTs were related to motor recovery, 39 to cognitive function, and only 19 to psychosocial issues and community reintegration. The majority of the RCTs demonstrated a significant positive benefit. Conclusions: There is a robust evidence-base for stroke rehabilitation interventions in chronic stroke. This research synthesis reveals a paradox, whereby an impressive evidence-base contrasts with the limited optimism and resources available for rehabilitation in chronic stroke.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available