4.2 Article

Higher Susceptibility of Type 1 Diabetic Rats to Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection

Journal

TOHOKU JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 216, Issue 4, Pages 363-370

Publisher

TOHOKU UNIV MEDICAL PRESS
DOI: 10.1620/tjem.216.363

Keywords

type 1 diabetic rat; type 1 diabetes mellitus; tuberculosis; cytokine

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Welfare and Labour, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An association between diabetes mellitus and tuberculosis has been implicated for a long time. We have previously reported that Goto Kakizaki type 2 diabetic rats are highly susceptible to Mycobacterium (M.) tuberculosis infection. As a next step, we attempted to clarify whether type 1 diabetic rats are more Susceptible to M. tuberculosis than nondiabetic wild-type (WT) rats. Here, we Wed the Komeda diabetes-prone (KDP) rat, as a model of type 1 diabetes mellitus. The infected KDP rats developed large granulomas without central necrosis in their lungs, liver or spleen. This was consistent with a significant increase in the number of colony-forming units (cfu) of M. tuberculosis in the lungs and spleen (p < 0.01). Insulin treatment resulted in significant reduction of tubercle bacilli in the infected KDP rats (p < 0.01). Pulmonary levels of interferon-gamma, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1 beta mRNAs were higher in the infected diabetic rats than in WT rats. Alveolar macrophages from KDP rats were not fully activated by M. tuberculosis infection because the macrophages did not secrete nitric oxide (NO) that can kill M. tuberculosis (p < 0.01), but no significant difference in phagocytosis Of tubercle bacilli by alveolar macrophages was observed between KDP and WT rats. Taken together, our findings indicate that type 1 diabetic rats are more susceptible to M. tuberculosis that WT rats.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available