4.6 Review

Carotid artery dissections: Thrombosis of the false lumen

Journal

THROMBOSIS RESEARCH
Volume 128, Issue 4, Pages 317-324

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.06.024

Keywords

Arterial dissections; Carotid artery; False lumen; Hemostasis; Thrombosis

Funding

  1. Canadian Blood Services and Health Canada
  2. Bayer Thrombosis & Hemostasis Research Granct

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carotid artery dissections are the second leading cause of stroke in young adults. The hemostatic response to a dissection involves exposure of the subendothelium to the intravascular environment. Platelet activation/aggregation superimposed by secondary coagulation cascade activity attempts to heal the injury. Failure of the hemostatic response to heal the injury may lead to further rupture of the intimal and medial layers, which allows for the blood to penetrate these layers to create a false lumen. Continued hemorrhaging into the false lumen may result in dissection progression or obstruction of blood supply to the true lumen and downstream blood vessels. The effects of thrombosis in the true versus false lumen may lead to opposite consequences. True lumen clotting may lead to ischemic complications of downstream cerebral vasculature, whereas false lumen clotting may lead to dissection healing. Current information on clinical outcomes and degree of false lumen clotting in a carotid dissection model is limited, and most of the available information on this controversial topic has been inferred from aortic dissections. Therefore in this report we summarize the present state of knowledge of the pathophysiology, detailed hemostatic response to the injury, clinical presentation and treatment of carotid dissections. We also emphasize the need for future studies to investigate the degree of false lumen clotting on the clinical outcomes of carotid dissections. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available