4.6 Article

Red blood cell distribution width and the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality

Journal

THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages 300-307

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1160/TH13-07-0567

Keywords

RDW; community cohort; major cardiovascular events; total mortality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) has been shown to predict cardiovascular mortality in various populations, but studies were less conclusive regarding cardiovascular morbidity. We aimed at evaluating the prognostic effect of RDW on cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality in the largest community cohort to date. We utilised the computerised database of a large community based healthcare maintenance organization (HMO) in Israel to identify a cohort of 225,006 eligible patients aged 40 or above who performed a blood count during 2006. We evaluated the relationship between 1% increments of ROW values and major cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality over a period of five years. A total of 21,939 incident cases of a major cardiovascular event and 4,287 deaths were documented during a total of six years of follow up, respectively. In comparison with patients with RDW level <13%, the hazard ratio for total mortality gradually increased to 4.57 (95% confidence interval [Cl]: 3.35-6.24, p<0.001) among male patients and to 3.26 (95% Cl: 2.49-4.28, p<0.001) among female patients with a ROW of 17% or above. Similar results were evident in anaemic and non-anaemic populations. ROW above 17% was also associated with a modest increased risk of major cardiovascular events in females 1.26 (95% Cl: 1.03-1.52,; p=0.021), while in men : it was not significant, 1.08 (95% Cl: 0.82-1.41, p=NS). In conclusion, increasing RDW levels significantly; increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality. Our observation is evident in both anaemic and non-anaemic patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available