4.0 Article

Analysis of chromosome 22q11 copy number variations by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification for prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defect

Journal

MOLECULAR CYTOGENETICS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13039-015-0209-5

Keywords

Congenital heart defects; 22q11 deletion syndrome; Prenatal diagnosis; MLPA

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81300495]
  2. Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation [BK20141076]
  3. Medical Leading Talent and Innovation Team Project of Jiangsu Province [LJ201109]
  4. Key Technology R&D Program of Jiangsu Province [BL2012039]
  5. Foundation of Jiangsu Provincial Department of Health [H201343, F201216]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Congenital heart defects (CHD) represent one of the most common birth defects. This study aimed to evaluate the value of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) as a tool to detect the copy number variations (CNVs) of 22q11 in fetuses with CHD. Results: A large cohort of 225 fetuses with CHD was screened by fetal echocardiography. Once common chromosome abnormalities in 30 fetuses were screened out by conventional G-banding analysis, the CNVs of chromosome 22q11 in the remaining 195 fetuses were determined by MLPA for prenatal genetic counseling. In 195 CHD fetuses with normal karyotype, 11 cases had pathological CNVs, including 22q11.2 deletion (seven cases), the deletion of 22q11 cat eye syndrome (CES) region (one case), 22q11.2 duplication (one case), 22q13.3 deletion (one case) and 17p13.3 deletion (one case). In total, our findings from MLPA screening represented 4.9 % in our cohort. Among these, three cases were inherited CNVs, and eight cases were de novo. These CNVs were further verified by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-array analysis, and their chromosomal location was refined. Conclusion: This study indicated that MLPA could serve as an effective test for routine prenatal diagnosis of 22q11 in fetuses with CHD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available